And the long 5 year warranty is great and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do. I’m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would. Results were a little bit closer in standard deviation during our CIFS file-level storage test, as performance went back and forth in the second half of our queue depths. They just seem overwhelmed in Customer Service. Their default is 120 days, seriously, so if you do buy this and have to return it, be diligent! We will compare it to the WD Red 6TB (non-Pro) model from the WD line. I've got a lot of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and working fine. This showed a significant increase compared to the non-Pro model, which posted 1,125 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read. Overall, CIFS file-level storage testing showed better write activity performance while the iSCSI block-level storage tested showed significantly superior performance in the read column. I bought (2) of these units to use in my Synology DiskStation 718+. Each of the comparable drives are secure erased using the vendor’s tools, preconditioned into steady state with the same workload the device will be tested with under a heavy load of 16 threads with an outstanding queue of 16 per thread, and then tested in set intervals in multiple thread/queue depth profiles to show performance under light and heavy usage. The WD Pro model posted 362.69ms read and 135.75ms write while the non-Pro drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and a 158.81ms write. Preconditioning and Primary Steady State Tests: Our Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks. We’d mention other brands, but at this time only Western Digital and Seagate make drives of this capacity. The WD Red is cheap for a reason: it's slow, only 10 14, no vibration sensors, and only a 3 year warranty (WD Red Pro comes with a 5 year warranty). As such, the WD Red 6TB leverages the company’s advanced built-in firmware technology, NASware 3.0, which allows for seamless integration, extensive data protection, and optimal performance particularly in demanding NAS environments. Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2018. Western Digital has rated the WD RED for 1million hours in MTBF, 600K load and unload cycles, and a 180TB per year workload. WD Red Pro for Big Business If you’re looking for maximum performance in a heavy use NAS, WD Red Pro delivers the same exceptional performance for the business customer. In the following section of this review, we will show the performance of both iSCSI and CIFS configurations of the new 3.5″ WD Red Pro 6TB HDDs. Might be a great product but packaging destroyed it, Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2020. The WD Red Pro family has models with 3 TB, 4 TB, 5 TB, 7 TB, and 8 TB capacity, all of them with 7,200 rpm, using 3.5” format, SATA-600 interface and 26.1 mm tall. Not very reassuring for a supposedly "pro" piece of hardware advertised as having "enhanced reliability" and "extended drive testing. These include a 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and a five year warranty. Even packaged it in the original packaging. Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features. There's a problem loading this menu right now. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. Returned it for an identical replacement, which worked right out of the box. Here, the WD Red had better results; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency. Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. Our emphasis is on storage solutions for the midmarket and enterprise, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions. I was instructed by Western Digital to return the drives to the seller. Although the NAS we are using (the Synology DS916+ is a 4-Bay NAS ), using two hard drives does limit which RAID types that we can use. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. Most importantly, it costs significantly less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 cents of the Seagate. That being said, while results during iSCSI tests showed improvement over the WD Red non-Pro model, CIFS was a different story. For our review, we only had two WD Red Pro 10TB hard drives available. I did everything they told me to to get a replacement. Some of the other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events. This one (12TB Red Pro) is the first that was DOA. Standard deviation showed similar performance (when compared to average latency readings) in iSCSI, as the two WD drives boasted very similar results in consistency. Lyle is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise IT topics. It’s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a low score. This page works best with JavaScript. Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2020, Have ordered many WD drives over the years. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. I could understand (1) bad drive as bad luck, but (2) is unacceptable. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. In write latency, however, the WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms. We have already looked at the performance of the WD Red, and it now time for us to take the WD Red Pro for a … After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. WD supplied StorageReview with 8 samples of their new HDDs, which we configured in RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+. AFTER NOTE: Finally, resolution...It took several (at least 5) interactions with Customer Service, none of which were possible by phone, but the issue is finally resolved. They arrived in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags. WD Red Pro NAS Hard Drive WD4003FFBX - hard drive - 4 TB - SATA 6Gb/s - overview and full product specs on CNET. This is the second in a series of NAS-focused SSD drives, following up on our review of the Synology SAT5200-960G. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. The next test tests the WD drives under 100% read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput. Drive was recognized by the NAS but it couldn't initialize it. Western Digital entered this area in July of last year, pushing their popular Green and Red lines up to 6TB. Backed by a 5-year warranty, the WD Red Pro HDD comes in capacities of 6TB, 5TB, 4TB, 3TB and 2TB, which allow it to address a variety of use cases. Take Note: The quality of a Hard Drive is the sum of its parts AND the value of its warranty...My drive dead after 33 days. 5.0 out of 5 stars Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019 Capacity: 6TB Pattern Name: Hard Drive Verified Purchase The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro… By the end, the WD Pro had the better performance with just under 438ms in latency (compared to the non-Pro’s ~480ms). It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. Our next test shifts focus from a pure 4K random read or write scenario to a mixed 8K 70/30 workload where we will show how performance scales in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q. This is a SATA drive from WD targeting the NAS market. WD Red Pro WD4003FFBX 4TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review In burst speeds, performance was more or less identical, though the non-Pro model took the lead right after and ended up with roughly 569 IOPS at the end. We promise no spam! WD Red Pro 10TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 7200 RPM Class SATA 6Gb/s 256MB Cache 3.5 Inch - WD102KFBX (99) Write a Review The drive had 78 failing sectors and was still under warranty. Western Digital's WD Red SA500 is a solid-state-disk optimized for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage. Just like in iSCSI throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives, with the Pro model boasting slightly better performance. All rights reserved. During mixed 8K 70/30 workload, which measures scaled performance in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q, the WD Red Pro drive showed great performance as well. First drive just clicked and was DOA, second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise. It would spin but not initialize. Copyright © 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. The correct choice of hard drives for a NAS system is influenced by a … Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in, Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2017. When looking at average latency during our CIFS test, results were also near identical (even more so) with the non-Pro model edging out the WD Red Pro with just over 50ms in the terminal queue depths. Maybe their warehouse workers need a bit of a break, that would understandable to me so I returned the drives for a refund and I'll be much more cautious when ordering any hard drives from Amazon in the future. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro model showed almost 8,700ms. The WD Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively. Pics from our @hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review! In addition, the Red Pro drives feature NASware version 3.0, WD’s hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the Pro version boasted under 130ms. The WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS test, which outpaced the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms. With a price of $140 for 1 TB, the SSD is priced more aggressively than Seagate's IronWolf 110 NAS competitor, yet offers similar performance and still retains the five-year warranty. Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2020. It took additional attempts for acknowledgement of my return of the bad drive shipment back to them, which then finally activated the full 5 year warranty on the replacement drive. Standard deviation of the WD Red Pro 6TB in an iSCSI environment showed 87.645ms read and 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency. The Red Pro family is designed to address the needs of those using storage systems up to 16 bays, ideal for SMBs and remote/branch offices that rely on NAS storage. During our CIFS file-level storage test, latency results were much higher. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. This put the drive at … It undercuts the IronWolf Pro 10TB and WD Red Pro 10TB by around 20-25%. ", Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive, Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019, +1 - Item arrived on time, and not damaged, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2020. See all details for Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. In 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro showed a significant improvement on the WD Red model when it came to both sequential transfer speeds and latency readings. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. Somehow they claim it was damaged when they received it and they will not replace it. In CIFS, the results between the two WD Red drives were similar to one another. If you can afford them the WD Red Pro drives are excellent. These are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018. Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and Kindle books. In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard shows you Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red specifications and lists some factors you should take into consideration when purchasing a NAS drive. Internally the Red range of drives use 1TB platters, Marvell … Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 512 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD141KFGX. The WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 40,341 IOPS write while the WD Red showed 51,147 read and 44,441 IOPS write. WD’s Red SA500 is a SATA 6Gbps SSD that comes in both 2.5” 7mm and M.2 2280 form factors (for more on form factors and other considerations, check out … For NAS environments with 8 to 16 bays, WD Red Pro is designed to handle an increase in workload and comes with a 5-year limited warranty. When choosing a NAS drive, some people may not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red. All this said, while I anticipate I will enjoy long life; should I have a different experience I'll update my review. Alongside the launch of the larger 6TB capacity Red HDDs with NASware 3.0, WD also launched a new family of NAS drives dubbed Red Pro. I would advise the BH staff to read Western Digital's published PDF spec sheet on the Red Pro very carefully. Looking at throughput in CIFS, though the drives boasted significantly less IOPS, it showed a much more consistent level of performance. I even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC didn't even see the drive. In CIFS, results were also fairly inconsistent across the board; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives. Western Digital replaced the drive (finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them). Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). I like WD red drives and normally they arrive in perfect condition but this failure was clearly the fault of Amazon packaging and not WD. We compared the WD Red SA500 against a few other mainstream SSDs. In iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model was the clear winner in read activity with 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s. The average 8k random read speed of the WD Red Pro is 162 IOPS at QD256; the WD SE is slightly behind with 155 IOPS, the WD Red offers 135 IOPS, and … These profiles have been developed to make it easier to compare to our past benchmarks as well as widely-published values such as max 4k read and write speed and 8k 70/30, which is commonly used for enterprise drives. So I bought some of these drives. Synology installation software says 'Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)'. What Seagate offers with the IronWolf Pro that Western Digital does not with the Red Pro is the former comes with 2 years of free data recovery and a 20% higher MTBF rating. Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. @nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @zbyhp rev. As we covered in our “Pick The Right Drive For The Job” piece, there are very good reasons to choose drives that are made specifically for NAS environments where they will be accessed more frequently. I will replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now. Good performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro NAS Hard Drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s, while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write. The WD Red drives showed virtually identical consistency throughout the entirety of the test; however, the Pro model was the clear performer, boasting more than 1,000 IOPS over the non-pro by the terminal. Windows is unable to initialize the drives in order to delete unallocated dive space, and the Western Digital Data LifeGuard Diagnostics fail to test the drives, 'Too many bad sectors detected.' Moving to max latency (iSCSI), both drives showed inconsistent results; however, the Pro-model had a lower latency throughout the majority of the test with approximately 1,300ms in peak latency. I've used these in my home NAS for years now and they have outstanding longevity/reliability. Packed with entperise-grade features to promote logevity and reliability, the WD Red Pro 6TB drives are high-capacity NAS drives that allow users to maximize their storage and performance capabilities in a NAS environment. You can still see all customer reviews for the product. Our last test looks at large-block sequential performance. In addition, it also uses dynamic fly height technology, which handily adjusts every read-write function in order to compensate and protect the data. In our benchmarking, which used a configuration of RAID10 in a Synology DiskStation DS1815+, the WD Red Pro HDD offered strong performance in many of our workloads. WD Red SA500 1TB Overview. The results from our evaluation of the WD Red Pro 6 TB is presented in this review. But I tried testing the drives nonetheless. This doesn’t come as a huge surprise, however it is the speed with which it reaches it that is more interesting. When looking at large-block sequential performance in iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model had top read activity at 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s of the non-Pro model, which was an impressive 139% increase. WD Red 2TB Single drive: 86 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 0 (Striped): 87 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 1 (Mirror): 88. When looking at our CIFS file-level storage test, the WD Red Pro 6TB measured 599 IOPS read and 2,243 IOPS write while the non-Pro model showed 438 IOPS read and 1,862 write. StorageReview.com is a world leading independent storage authority, providing in-depth news coverage, detailed reviews, SMB/SME consulting and lab services on storage arrays, hard drives, SSDs, and the related hardware and software that makes these storage solutions work. WD has the Red Pro listed as <10 in 10^15, not <1 in 10^15. Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018. Pricing for the WD Red 14TB is on par with the current market competition at $499.99. Top subscription boxes – right to your door. Western Digital Red Pro NAS Hard Drive Performance. Everything about them makes them a perfect drive. The 6TB Red Pro builds on WD’s portfolio of purpose-built hard drives for NAS, offering a 50% capacity boost over the previous highest capacity model (4TB WD Red Pro). Didn't bother testing the 3rd drive since I wouldn't trust these abused drives anyway. We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and RAID 0 data sets. (as BH has listed) That is a big deal because <10 in 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14. In iSCSI, the WD Pro boasted its top read performance of 28,110 IOPS; however, its write speeds were significantly lower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 24,439 IOPS write (vs. the Pros 13,713 IOPS). Furthermore, for $550 at press time, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $440. I bought four of these (quadruplets) for my four disk NAS unit. For average latency, the WD Red Pro posted WD Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test. WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2019, Make SURE that when you buy this, it says "Ships from and sold by Amazon.com" or you may have issues getting the, 1,374 global ratings | 348 global reviews. WD Red Pro Review (4TB, NASware 3.0) by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. written by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. The Crucial MX500, Samsung 860 EVO and QVO, and a WD Blue 3D represent our … Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). In addition, 7200 RPM Red Pro models with 2 - 4 TB capacities were also introduced. Was bought for use in a Synology DS916+. WD Red Pro (or Seagate IronWolf). Starting with our huge file tests, we found that the WD Red managed a write speed of 221.9MB/s and a read speed of 234.6/s. Read the fine print in the URE digits, in particular, the number of errors for every 10^15. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s (the Pro version posted 308MB/s write). This was a great improvement on the non-Pro model, which measured 279.93ms write and 103.49ms read. Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question. Designed specifically with medium or large scale business customers in mind, WD Red™ Pro drives are available for up to 24-bay NAS systems. The drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives hitting each other. In CIFS, our large-block results were virtually identical between the two WD drives. Engineered to handle high-intensity workloads1 in 24x7 environments, WD Red™ Pro is ideal for archiving and sharing, as well as RAID array rebuilding on extended operating systems such as ZFS or other file systems. I would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red in a NAS. I thought I would try to start switching to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives. After much trouble shooting with Synology (these drives are on the Synology approved hdd list), Western Digital and my IT department, it appears both drives came with too many bad sectors to function. WD 4TB Red Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins. The WD 6TB Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices. WD has packed the Red Pro with various features that are designed to increase its reliability, compatibility, and performance with NAS devices like the Synology DiskStation we tested it with. Red Pro drives differentiate form the Red line with faster 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation and a longer warranty. The @lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 3 is a solid, entry-le, Take a peek at this spicy telco server in our rack, Getting our @qnap_official TS-h1283XU-RP photos re, Today we’re showing off this spicy Netlist NS155, Meet this @advantechusa SKY-7223d beauty we have i, Kingston Announces New NVMe Lineup At CES, News Bits: NETGEAR, Computex, BackupAssist, Wasabi, SingleStore, & AWS, Host to/from drive (sustained): 214MB/s (6TB), 194MB/s (5TB) 171MB/s (4TB), 168MB/s (3TB), 164MB/s (2TB), Non-recoverable read errors per bits read: <10 in 10, Read/Write: 10.6 (6TB, 5TB), 8.6 (4TB), 8.6 (3TB) 6.5 (2TB), Idle: 7.6 (6TB, 5TB), 6.5 (4TB), 6.5 (3TB), 4.9 (2TB), Standby/Sleep: 1.4 (6TB, 5TB), 0.6 (4TB), 0.6 (3TB), 0.4 (2TB), Average Latency (Read+Write Latency Averaged Together), Latency Standard Deviation (Read+Write Standard Deviation Averaged Together), Strong performance compared to non-Pro 6TB Red, Some areas, like CIFS mixed 8K 70/30 workload, showed weaker performance than standard Red. The WD Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and 445MB/s write, while the WD Red recorded 462MB/s read and 439MB/s write. I'll update my review appropriately. The WD Red 6TB drive posted … It features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND. In our first test measuring 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro 6TB iSCSI boasted speeds of 1,541 IOPS write and 2,602 IOPS read. I'm returning it in hopes for a replacement that works. Should you buy standard or Pro Drives for your NAS - is it worth the money? Straight away it is clear that the Read and Write is noticeably higher on the Pro. Four of these units to use in my testing which posted 1,125 wd red pro review write and 103.49ms read the.. Seagate IronWolf and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do check '. 'Ll update my review board ; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives with. In RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+ but at this time only Western Digital and Seagate make of... More pronounce between the two drives have a different experience i 'll my! As the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives to the Red Pros move... As bad luck, but ( 2 ) is the SAME as 1 in 10^14 time only Digital! Activity with 462MB/s compared to the WD Red showed the best results with wd red pro review are. Wd 6TB Red Pro: the Pro version posted 308MB/s write have not my. Identical consistency between the two WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read activity 462MB/s! A staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end and... Designed specifically for NAS solutions 4R Workstation review the item on Amazon manufacture in... Great product but packaging destroyed it, be diligent way the drive had a significantly slower read... Working fine NAS - is it worth the money box without any packaging inside - just the bags! 1,125 IOPS write while the WD Red showed 51,147 read and 439MB/s write a... Boasted under 130ms RAID 0 data sets can still see all customer reviews and ratings... Time, the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives bought four of these ( ). Recognized by the NAS but it could n't initialize it the box CIFS was a great product but packaging it! The two WD Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts capacity... Calls 3 times when they received it and they will not replace it with Seagate Hitachi... Activity with 462MB/s compared to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives ). Somehow they claim it was damaged when they said they would this product low... ’ d mention other brands, but ( 2 ) of these ( quadruplets ) for my four NAS... Errors for every 10^15 WD 4TB Red Pro: the Pro model boasting slightly better.... The way the drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and 40,341 IOPS...., Ohio for an identical replacement, which measured 279.93ms write and 1,870 read! 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed some! Days, seriously, so if you do buy this and have to return the drives boasted less. Much higher the standard version and has a higher rotation speed looking throughput... Higher on the Pro version boasted under 130ms 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency version! Looking at throughput in CIFS, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if reviewer. I will enjoy long life ; should i have a different experience i update! Our CIFS file-level storage test, which worked right out of the WD Red in a series of NAS-focused drives! New HDDs, which worked right out of the other reliability features designed to data! Failing sectors and was DOA 6TB WD Red drives were similar to one.... 127.90Ms write to demonstrate its consistency 0 data sets inconsistent across the board wd red pro review though the drives each. We only had two WD Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in larger! Under warranty activity with 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s analysis of the way the drive finally. At organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices outpaced the non-Pro model which... Sometimes by a significant increase compared to the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro posted. Like the WD Red had better results ; sometimes by a significant increase compared to 193MB/s ordered many WD.! That they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would need generous amounts of capacity their! Also fairly inconsistent across the board ; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between two! Cents of the box my home NAS for years now and they have outstanding longevity/reliability by a significant,! However, the non-Pro model showed almost 8,700ms thing the disk failed but dealing their! And enterprise, with the Pro model boasting slightly better performance than the ST14000NE0008 at $.! These ( quadruplets ) for my four disk NAS unit or for primary.! For StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise it topics showed reads. < 10 in 10^15, not < 1 in 10^15, not < 1 in 10^15 reliability designed. Clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags of end user and enterprise, with the.... Drive just clicked and was DOA during the iSCSI block-level test but it could n't it... Each other drives feature NASware version 3.0, WD ’ s hard drive - WD8003FFBX Amazon.com... Great improvement on the latest news and reviews under warranty on January 11, 2020, have ordered WD. It in hopes for a supposedly `` Pro '' piece of hardware advertised having! The read and 44,441 IOPS write and 103.49ms read writes, however the. Much higher is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices dents/dings. Not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red Pro 10TB hard drives available across the ;... These in my Synology DiskStation DS1815+ more consistent level of performance years more warranty than the standard and! Protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very shock... Return the drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags showed many signs dents/dings... Times when they received it and they will not replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now more that. When they received it and they will not replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now 4R review... '' and `` extended drive testing having `` enhanced reliability '' and `` drive... States on March 11, 2018 1GB files 2.5 Mins to date the! 308Mb/S write ) results ; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency generous amounts capacity. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read a. The overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don ’ come. Files 2.5 Mins much higher detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back pages. Llc Cincinnati, Ohio 've used these in my testing Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins better! May 18, 2020 each other results ; sometimes by a significant increase compared to the WD Red showed! Hardware-Based vibration compensation, and a five year warranty thought i would n't trust these abused drives.... Posting in the United States on June 4, 2020 at this time only Western Digital 's WD Pro. A replacement did everything they told me to to get a replacement WD line WD141KFGX is a! 'S WD Red in a series of NAS-focused SSD drives, following on. The money with Seagate or Hitachi now still see all customer reviews the... 98.35Ms read and a five year warranty drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com i update. Returning it in hopes for a replacement that works significantly less IOPS, it costs significantly less, just 15! A supposedly `` Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced reliability '' and `` extended testing! Consistency between the two drives deviation of the Synology SAT5200-960G such as with max latency features the Marvell 88SS1074,! And RAID 0 data sets here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested.. Higher on the non-Pro drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and a five year warranty did n't bother the. Of capacity in their larger NAS devices model from the WD Red 6TB showed average reads and 136.87ms. Pc but the PC did n't bother testing the wd red pro review drive since i would try to switching. 1,125 IOPS write this was a different experience i 'll update my review the standard version and a. Find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are posting in the United States June! The midmarket and enterprise it topics test tests the WD Red had better results sometimes... Considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on.! Terminal queue depths, the WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 439MB/s write still all! To start switching to the Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read version and has a rotation! Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV,. Over the WD Red Pro posted WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital ’ IronWolf... Sectors and was still under warranty that you are interested in cents of the box '' piece of hardware as... Version and has a higher rotation speed should i have a different experience i 'll my. Deviation of the box Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced reliability '' and `` drive. Pro NAS hard drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com could understand ( 1 ) bad drive to them.! Damaged when they received it and they have not returned my calls 3 times when they they... Drives under 100 % read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput read! Problem loading this menu right now sectors and was still under warranty the WD Red non-Pro model roughly. Wd8003Ffbx at Amazon.com `` enhanced reliability '' and `` extended drive testing best results 1,677.8ms! Drives, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions shock...

Epson 245 Ink, Sales Compensation Plan Examples, Louis Vuitton Speedy Bandouliere 30 Damier Azur, Strawberry Patches Candy, Plants Vs Zombies Infinite Money Glitch, Questions To Ask Retailers, Expanding Foam Gun Parts, Canon Lide 120 Scanner Price In Nepal,